Find, trace, and document
crypto for litigation.

Divorce & family law

Surface undisclosed or hidden crypto holdings during discovery, trace transfers between wallets and exchanges, and document the value of what you find for equitable distribution.

Estate & probate

Identify and value a decedent's on-chain holdings, trace transfers near the date of death, and produce a documented record for the estate inventory.

Fraud & recovery litigation

Trace where misappropriated funds went across chains, identify exchange off-ramps where the recipient is identifiable, and build the evidence trail for freezing orders and claims.

Bankruptcy & insolvency

Trace debtor transfers, surface concealed assets, and document movements that may constitute preferential or fraudulent transfers.

Commercial & contract disputes

Establish what was sent, when, to whom, and where it ended up — turning an opaque on-chain dispute into a documented timeline.

Everything organized by matter

Group every report, trace canvas, and monitored wallet under a client matter — with a matter number and engagement type (divorce, probate, fraud recovery…). Run a conflict check before opening one, add your own analyst commentary to any report, put your firm's name and bar number on the PDF, and export the entire matter as a single branded file — or share a draft via an email-gated, watermarked “under review” link.

A documented case dossier

Fund-flow trace, entity attribution with confidence tiers, evidence links anyone can independently verify, and a risk score — a timestamped, tamper-evident record for the file, exportable as a clean PDF exhibit. Every report is reproducible from public on-chain data; how it was generated and verified is documented at walletdna.com/methodology.

Valuation as of any date

Pick the date that matters — date of separation, date of death, date of transfer — and get the wallet's balance and USD value on that day, computed from archive block data (EVM chains) or full history replay (Bitcoin, Litecoin) and priced from a stated source. Each valuation saves with the report and appears as its own page in the PDF.

Attribution you can explain

Where funds reached fiat exchanges — the off-ramps where a recipient can be identified through legal process — graded in three evidence tiers: dated direct deposits to known exchange addresses; probable deposit addresses inferred from sweep patterns, with the funding and sweep transactions cited and always stated as probable; and exchange endpoints reached anywhere in the multi-hop trace. The strength of each lead is explicit before you draft the subpoena.

Where the trail leaves the chain

When funds cross to another chain through a bridge, the report says so instead of the trail vanishing at an unlabeled contract — naming the destination chain for canonical bridges (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon) and stating plainly when a multi-destination router's destination can't be resolved on-chain. It marks the exit; following the funds onward is a fresh trace on the destination chain, and the report draws that boundary explicitly — the kind of honest limit that holds up under cross-examination.

Cryptographic proof of wallet ownership

Send a signing link; the wallet holder signs a challenge message with the wallet's key (browser wallet or offline/hardware) and WalletDNA verifies it cryptographically — the proof, method, and timestamp are embedded in the report. Works on Ethereum and all EVM chains, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Solana, and Tron. Useful when a party claims — or disputes — control of an address.

Language you can use

A plain-English summary you can adapt for a declaration, memo, or filing — no blockchain expertise required to read it.

An assistant that cites its evidence

Ask questions about the wallet in plain English — “which counterparties are exchanges?”, “where could these funds be subpoenaed?” — and every address, transaction, and amount in the answer carries a numbered citation you can click to see the underlying tool evidence, sources and limitations included. Answers that fail citation validation are never shown, and the assistant declines to speculate on wallet ownership, future movements, or legal conclusions — those judgments stay yours.

Findings in your voice, not chat logs

Nothing you ask enters the deliverable by itself. You choose which answers become findings, give each your own heading, and rewrite the text in your own words — re-validated against the evidence, so a finding can be rephrased but never un-grounded. The PDF presents them as Supplementary Findings prepared under your name and firm, with citations to the data sources; your questions and exploratory dead ends never appear. The complete transcript stays in your records if how the work was produced is ever formally at issue.

Courtroom-readiness kit

The documents that make an analysis defensible: an Evidence Foundation & Methodology Statement (how the analysis is generated, its data sources and versioned methodology), a template expert declaration, a Daubert/Frye reliability talking-points memo, and a content-hash & attestation verification guide. Free to download — the foundation package enterprise firms get, for the $50K divorce and the small-firm fraud case. See walletdna.com/courtroom-readiness.

CLE course coming

Crypto Forensics Fundamentals for Attorneys — a five-module course that satisfies the duty of technology competence and covers reading on-chain evidence, the assertion-versus-overreach line (what a service label lets you plead), tracing misappropriated funds to the exchange off-ramps, and the legal process that turns a trace lead into an identified defendant (John Doe filings and Rule 45 subpoenas, Norwich Pharmacal orders, freezing relief) — closing on authentication and admissibility (Daubert/Frye) and the boundary between on-chain fact and legal conclusion. Launching first as accredited CPE, with a CLE version to follow state by state. Join the waitlist at walletdna.com/academy to be notified when it's approved in your state.